Civilization may be 65 - 100 Million Years Old!
by by C. L. Black
Although it is difficult to accept;there is good reason to believe that intelligent life and civilization did indeed exist on earth 65 to 100 million years ago.
The reason for this is that both archeology and geology have grown and expanded as fields of exploration and their new discoveries have not been fully integrated into the world's understanding of its past.
There are at least three major reasons for this. First, new methods of dating have not been applied to re-dating of past archeological artifact discoveries. Second, the new geological theories of plate tectonics have not been used to date ancient cities and other sites. Third, there has been, until now, a lack of a firm reference point to measure and date land movements over periods of millions of years.
Of course, there is also the fact that the current scientific establishment, has a vested interest in keeping things as they are. They don't want to 'rock the boat'.
Let us consider one example, the ICA Stones of Peru. Of all the evidence and artifacts studied these have got to be among the most perplexing and therefore the most rejected.
The ICA Stones depict images of dinosaurs and humans coexisting. Science has no way to deal with this concept so it rejects the ICA Stones. However, close examination of these stones demonstrate that they are both internally and externally
consistent with established scientific finds and theories. As such, they have to be 'true' depictions of the ancient past, say 65 to 100 million years ago.
Their external and internal consistency is characterized by the fact that all images on the stones fit what would be expected of the period of 65 to 100 million years ago. There is no mixing of images of modern technology with ancient animal life forms.
Furthermore, they reinforce current theories of evolution by illustrating life forms that are very similar to each other. This similarity is greater than we find in life forms on earth today.
However, the human images do not defend a human evolution from an ape like ancestor. The humans shown are our early human ancestors. They are obviously not human as we are. In spite of this, they do seem to exhibit human like behavior. They hunt, study the stars, have entertainment, conduct medical procedures, and even worship. These are all human behaviors.
These facts support the conclusion that although the human body changed or evolved over time, human behavior appears complete at a very early period in human evolution. In short, mankind was mankind even though the body was subject to change.
Given these consideration, it becomes obvious that our ancient human ancestors had a kind of civilization at the time of the dinosaurs over 65 million years ago.